Re: Grammatical Recursion
From: Tak To (takto_at_alum.mit.edu.-)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: Zobby: "Re: non-phonetic english spelling"
- Previous message: endipatterson: "re:What is branching"
- In reply to: Helmut Richter: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Tom Breton: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 09:38:08 -0500
Helmut Richter wrote:
> Correct terms are "Chomky type 2" = "context-free" and "Chomky type 3" =
> "regular". Terms like "recursive" and "iterative" are misleading in this
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Amen.
> context, if only because a "recursive set" is defined in a way that many
> more than the context-free languages fulfil the definition.
Tak
--
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----
Tak To takto@alum.mit.eduxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------^^
[taode takto ~{LU5B~}] NB: trim the xx to get my real email addr
- Next message: Zobby: "Re: non-phonetic english spelling"
- Previous message: endipatterson: "re:What is branching"
- In reply to: Helmut Richter: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Tom Breton: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
