Re: Grammatical Recursion
From: Tak To (takto_at_alum.mit.edu.-)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: Greg Lee: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Previous message: Zobby: "Re: non-phonetic english spelling"
- In reply to: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Rolleston: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:03:08 -0500
Florian Laws wrote:
> On 2004-12-19, Lee Sau Dan <danlee@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
>
Florian Laws <fl-usenet-2004@void.s.bawue.de> wrote:
FL.0> I does, but that only shows that Iteration is in fact
FL.0> just as powerful as Recursion.
Lee Sau Dan wrote:
LSD.1> Using a stack in an iteration cheats by adding recursive power
LSD.1> to it, thereby upgrading it to recursion. The additional power
LSD.1> of recursion over iteration lies in the (implicit) unbounded
LSD.1> stack.
FL.2> Well, computability theory doesn't care if you think of
FL.2> it as cheating.
LSD.3>>But it cares whether you use extra memory (the stack).
FL.4> By definition, WHILE-Programs can have infinitely many variables.
Not quite, but variables (or "registers") can be unbound in size.
(I am leaving out arrays of unbound size...)
----- -----
LSD.3> It also cares
LSD.3> how the memory is accessed (stack vs. tape vs. random-access).
FL.4> It does not, since the class of computable functions is the same for
FL.4> WHILE-Programs, µ-recursive functions and Turing machines.
Yup. Sau Dan is assuming a formalism (computation model) which has,
among other things, an unbound "stack", but fixed width "variables/
registers". Obviously, Turing Machine and Kleene Recursive Functions
are different formalisms.
As I said before, it is meaningless to compare recursion and iteration
without specifying a specific formalism (that have both notions).
Tak
--
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----
Tak To takto@alum.mit.eduxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------^^
[taode takto ~{LU5B~}] NB: trim the xx to get my real email addr
- Next message: Greg Lee: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Previous message: Zobby: "Re: non-phonetic english spelling"
- In reply to: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Rolleston: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|