Re: Grammatical Recursion
From: Greg Lee (greg_at_ling.lll.hawaii.edu)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Previous message: Tak To: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- In reply to: Tak To: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Dec 2004 15:27:31 GMT
Tak To <takto@alum.mit.edu.-> wrote:
> Tak To <takto@alum.mit.edu.-> wrote:
> > One can only talk about the difference between recursion and
> > iteration in the context of specific computation models.
> Greg Lee wrote:
> > Yes, because that's what they are -- computation models.
> That was not what I meant. Sorry, my bad. I should have said
> "formalism" in instead of "model" to avoid the confusion.
> Recursion and iteration are different types (or idioms) of
> algorithms in a formalism.
Those terms have not been used this way in most of this
discussion. Shifting the topic from the algorithms themselves
to the language in which the algorithms are described or
implemented takes things in a different and, for linguistics,
uninteresting direction.
...
-- Greg Lee <greg@ling.lll.hawaii.edu>
- Next message: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Previous message: Tak To: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- In reply to: Tak To: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|