Re: Expressing fractions
From: Django Cat (nospam_at_please.com)
Date: 01/03/05
- Next message: Don A. Gilmore: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Previous message: Linz: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- In reply to: Don A. Gilmore: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Next in thread: Don A. Gilmore: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Reply: Don A. Gilmore: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Reply: Jordan Abel: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Reply: Skitt: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 19:36:21 +0000
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:13:12 -0600, "Don A. Gilmore"
<eromlignodNOSPM@kc.rr.com> wrote:
>"Javi" <poziNOSPAMyo@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3402jcF44n2c5U1@individual.net...
>> Harvey Van Sickle wrote:
>> > On 03 Jan 2005, Don A. Gilmore wrote
>> >>The problem with higher voltages is that they are more dangerous
>> >>if you come in contact with them and, if large enough, can present
>> >>arcing problems if conductors are not spaced and/or insulated from
>> >>each other enough.
>> >
>> >
>> > The use of 220V for standard appliances -- like table lamps --
>> > frightened me a bit when I moved to the UK, as I'd only ever seen that
>> > voltage used for things like electric cookers/stoves.
>>
>> The use of a higher voltage implies that less intensity is necessary for
>> the same power (wattage). A high voltage is not necessarily more
>> dangerous than a lower voltage, usually it is the opposite. What kills
>> people is high intensity, not high voltage, and 220V needs half the
>> intensity than 110V for the same wattage. When I was younger and had a
>> small motorbike that needed frecuently spark-plug cleaning, I sometimes
>> received a electric discharge from the spark-plug when testing it, and
>> that was around 4000-5000 volts; it hurt a bit, but did not kill me.
>
>
>Intensity?? That's a new one on me. Voltage is indeed what you must avoid.
>There is an often-misunderstood statement that "it's the current that kills
>you", citing that as little as 0.1 amperes can cause death. This is
>technically true, but such a statement is very misleading to those who don't
>understand the elementary principles of electricity. What does it take to
>*produce* 0.1 amps of current through your body?
>
>The electrical outlets in your home can essentially be treated as "ideal"
>voltage sources. In other words, the outlet provides a constant 120 volts,
>regardless of the load attached to it. The amount of current that results
>from the connection is a result of what appliance is connected to it.
>
>A 60-watt bulb (in the US) is designed to require 60 watts of power when
>connected to a 120-volt circuit. That means that it will draw a current of
>0.5 amps. If you replace this bulb with a 120-watt one, it will pull 1.0
>amp. The 120-watt bulb has a filament that has a lower resistance to
>electricity and can withstand more current and dissipate more energy in the
>form of light. If you plug a 1200-watt space heater in, there will be 10
>amps of current in the line.
>
>So what happens when you plug your fingers into the socket? Well, that
>depends on how much the part of your body that you plug into it resists the
>electricity, just like any other appliance. It also depends on what the
>electricity passes through. If it passes from the forefinger to the middle
>finger of your right hand, there will be less resistance than through your
>whole body, so more current will pass. But since there aren't really any
>vital organs in your hand, it probably won't kill you. In fact you could
>survive a pretty high voltage through just one hand. With really high
>voltages, it might even vaporize your hand, but this is arguably a
>survivable injury.
>
>If you grab two wires, one in each hand, or grab a hot wire while standing
>in a pool of water that is grounded, then you are passing current through
>vital organs. The lethality still depends on your resistance and what
>voltage we are talking about. Your body's resistance can vary a lot due to
>how hydrated you are, your salt content, the humidity, etc. If it takes 0.1
>amps through your heart to kill you and you grab onto 120 volts, then you
>would need a minimum resistance of 1200 ohms, which is possible, but
>extremely low for living tissue and thus unlikely. I have grabbed 120 and
>240 many times in my career and have lived to tell the tale.
>
>Incidentally, I just took my ohmmeter out of my desk drawer and I measure
>about 700,000 ohms between my left and right hands.
I just tried this and the needle didn't even twitch.
Is this a bad sign?
DC
- Next message: Don A. Gilmore: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Previous message: Linz: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- In reply to: Don A. Gilmore: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Next in thread: Don A. Gilmore: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Reply: Don A. Gilmore: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Reply: Jordan Abel: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Reply: Skitt: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|