Re: Prosody-only utterance
From: Miguel Carrasquer (mcv_at_wxs.nl)
Date: 01/09/05
- Next message: mb: "Re: Pronunciation of Maltese name Calleja"
- Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Computer Number Concord"
- In reply to: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Next in thread: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Reply: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:03:16 +0100
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:44:24 -0000, "Douglas G. Kilday"
<fufluns@chorus.net> wrote:
>I use the nasalized forms often, and regard them as [?m?m] 'no' and [?mhm]
>'yes'. Since I regard them as part of English speech, I consider the pair
>to prove that English has a phonemic glottal stop, as /?/ and /h/ provide a
>minimal-pair contrast.
In that case, do you consider [t!] (dental click) to be
speech?
I was reminded of the click because I remembered Ruhlen
gives Proto-Khoisan YES: Khakhea N/N\. !Kung N/N\ and NO:
Khakhea N\N/, !Kung N\N/.
=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@wxs.nl
- Next message: mb: "Re: Pronunciation of Maltese name Calleja"
- Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Computer Number Concord"
- In reply to: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Next in thread: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Reply: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading