Re: Prosody-only utterance
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 01/09/05
- Next message: Robert Bannister: "Re: Usage of "first name/last name" (Re: Expressing fractions)"
- Previous message: Robert Bannister: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- In reply to: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Next in thread: Greg Lee: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Reply: Greg Lee: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 23:50:29 GMT
Douglas G. Kilday wrote:
> I use the nasalized forms often, and regard them as [?m?m] 'no' and [?mhm]
> 'yes'. Since I regard them as part of English speech, I consider the pair
> to prove that English has a phonemic glottal stop, as /?/ and /h/ provide a
> minimal-pair contrast. Variations in pitch and stress convey emotional
> information which may be equivalent to spoken information.
Elementary linguistics textbooks routinely discuss those forms (and
Miguel's click, "tsk" (UK: "tut")) as examples of paralinguistic
utterances. They are not part of the English language.
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Robert Bannister: "Re: Usage of "first name/last name" (Re: Expressing fractions)"
- Previous message: Robert Bannister: "Re: Expressing fractions"
- In reply to: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Next in thread: Greg Lee: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Reply: Greg Lee: "Re: Prosody-only utterance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]