Re: Marie Jean Faucounau sues me for at least 8,487 Swiss Fr

From: Franz Gnaedinger (frgn_at_bluemail.ch)
Date: 01/13/05 

Date: 13 Jan 2005 02:02:12 -0800

dgomez wrote:

> Mr. Franz Gnaedinger,
>
> It is clear you are unable to answer such a simple question.
> Just refrain yourself from pasting my name in your postings trying
> to relate my work with "your" Bernoulli's sequence for the square
> root.
> Stop by making false statements about me and my work. That's it.
> Domingo Gomez Morin
> mipagina.cantv.net/arithmetic

Why should I mention Bernoulli when examining Egyptian buildings
and the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus? My compatriote Bernoulli was
neither involved in pyramid building, nor kin to Ahmes, nor to
that forgotten author of the lost original of which the Rhind
Mathematical Papyrus is a copy (the lost original dated from
around 1850 BC, Ahmes's copy dates from c. 1650 BC). And what
about Bar Leni? He shall teach at the University of Lagany on
Mars and publish his famous General Number Theory (GNT) in 7129
AD. Real mathematics will begin by then; all that was before,
and especially that primitive "mathematics" by the earthlings,
was mere speculation, not yet really scientific, which is proved
by a recently discovered statement, actually of a copy of a copy
of a copy of a quote by one Andy Why (Andrew Wiles) who explained
his way of doing mathematics as strolling around in a dark mansion
and bumping into furniture ... No, the earthlings had no idea of
doing mathematics in a systematic manner. Real mathematics begins
with Bar Leni at Lagany University on Mars in 7129 AD. Who will
remember Bernoulli by then? Perhaps a reincarnation of mine,
and that poor reincarnation of mine will of course be shouted
down: them primitive earthlings of the Early Concrete Age had
_no_ real understanding of mathematics!

Speaking of number columns is idle then. However, as you and
me are earthlings, I may add a word. I gave a correct summary
of our discussions in the math-history list, I rendered the
algorithm of my number columns correctly, while I have been
falsely accused by you for having stolen them from you. My
algorithm is different from yours, and your algorithm is the
extended algorithm of the so-called ladder of Eratosthenes.
-
Franz Gnaedinger www.seshat.ch

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantors diagonal proof wrong?
    ... Yes, the problem is *language*; ... The algorithm is trivial, ... >about how some important things are formally defined in mathematics. ... >hardware, whether that's computer hardware, or neural brain hardware. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Symbolic computation issues
    ... Axiom is clearly not driven by sales. ... Mathematics will continue to be a fundamental and growing science. ... associated with the algebra algorithms. ... for the mathematical algorithm developer ...
    (sci.math.symbolic)
  • =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_What_does_G=F6dels_Incompleteness_mean_for_the_Working_Mathematician=3F?=
    ... There is no reason to believe that either is the case in Peano ... alternative interpretation of Gödelian incompleteness under Church's ... algorithm computes an arithmetical relation R, ... understanding of classical mathematics as suggested by standard ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Natural language programming?
    ... A doctor MUST know certain things, or he is not a doctor. ... > In the same way that playing monopoly is a form of mathematics. ... The science part should be obvious. ... but the underlying algorithm to perform a task remains the same. ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: syllogism
    ... particularly when you lump science theory (leading toward ... >> algorithm (not tautology, not to balance a formula but to develop a ... requires or necessitates B) is not so important for my point. ... I consider to be a part of mathematics; ...
    (sci.logic)