Re: Free word order (Re: A general question on learning languages)
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 01/19/05
- Next message: Bobby D. Bryant: "Re: Found on fr.soc.histoire.antique"
- Previous message: Marc Adler: "Re: a nadder?"
- In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Free word order (Re: A general question on learning languages)"
- Next in thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Free word order (Re: A general question on learning languages)"
- Reply: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Free word order (Re: A general question on learning languages)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:05:50 +1000
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> Thus, "free word order" does _not_ mean that word order is immaterial and
> random. On the contrary, it means that word order can be used to express
> fine distinctions and nuances in a concise way.
I will not go along with that. Take the French example I gave:
four subunits, 4*3*2 = 24 permutations. Twenty-four different
distinctions? I don't buy it.
My view is: you start with what comes to your mind, then you
fill the rest in, in the order that comes to your mind.
A king-high straight remains a king-high straight, whichever
order you were dealt the cards.
- Next message: Bobby D. Bryant: "Re: Found on fr.soc.histoire.antique"
- Previous message: Marc Adler: "Re: a nadder?"
- In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Free word order (Re: A general question on learning languages)"
- Next in thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Free word order (Re: A general question on learning languages)"
- Reply: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Free word order (Re: A general question on learning languages)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|