Re: Smileys as extensions to the alphabet?
From: Ron Hardin (rhhardin_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: Aslan Kral: "Re: Free word order (Re: A general question on learning languages)"
- Previous message: dayn: "min"
- In reply to: Brian M. Scott: "Re: Smileys as extensions to the alphabet?"
- Next in thread: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Smileys as extensions to the alphabet?"
- Reply: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Smileys as extensions to the alphabet?"
- Reply: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Smileys as extensions to the alphabet?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:13:19 GMT
Brian M. Scott wrote:
> >>> e grege
>
> >> Yes, I'm sure many of us know that Latin *has* a word written "e". What
> >> does that have to do with abbreviating words that begin with "e" but
> >> aren't "e"?
>
> > That's the meaning of eg.
>
> There is no standard abbreviation <eg.>, and <e.g.> is, as
> Aidan said, the abbreviation of <exampli gratia>.
Another philosophical difficulty! I learned ``e grege'' and that's what it means
when I use it. I believe you will find the semantics work out better.
Also that there is no Latin word exampli counts a little against your version, at
least I'd suppose it would.
-- Ron Hardin rhhardin@mindspring.com On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
- Next message: Aslan Kral: "Re: Free word order (Re: A general question on learning languages)"
- Previous message: dayn: "min"
- In reply to: Brian M. Scott: "Re: Smileys as extensions to the alphabet?"
- Next in thread: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Smileys as extensions to the alphabet?"
- Reply: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Smileys as extensions to the alphabet?"
- Reply: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Smileys as extensions to the alphabet?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|