Re: Is "oo" a diphthong?
From: josephus (dogbird_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: matin: "Re: A new Korean-invented Chinese name for Korean city"
- Previous message: Harlan Messinger: "Re: A new Korean-invented Chinese name for Korean city"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Is "oo" a diphthong?"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Is "oo" a diphthong?"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Is "oo" a diphthong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:05:08 GMT
the real reason is simple I learned to read and speak Standard English
and the vocabulary I initially learned was different than the version I
subsequently learned. Which part of English speaker did I leave out?
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> josephus wrote:
>
>> I think the problem is deeper. In the recognition of the brain.
>> Americans cannot distinguish the difference between Kill and Cool
>> /ki/ versus /ku/
>>
>> I can just hear it. But I actually speak a version of Englhish
>>that has Long and short vowesls as phonemss. Hearing is very complex.
>>
>> Its true; English is my second language.
>
>
> Then why did you claim earlier that English is your native language?
- Next message: matin: "Re: A new Korean-invented Chinese name for Korean city"
- Previous message: Harlan Messinger: "Re: A new Korean-invented Chinese name for Korean city"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Is "oo" a diphthong?"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Is "oo" a diphthong?"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Is "oo" a diphthong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|