Re: s
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Franz Gnaedinger: "Re: genes and language (Homer, Richard Dawkins)"
- Previous message: Paul J Kriha: "Re: ixnij chelovek?"
- In reply to: dayn: "s"
- Next in thread: André Keshav: "Re: s"
- Reply: André Keshav: "Re: s"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:17:31 +1000
dayn wrote:
>
> In http://phoenicia.org/ychromodrafteng.html
> *---------------------------------*
> Posted at: http://www.GroupSrv.com
> *---------------------------------*
>
> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.usenet.com
Getting better and better: absolutely nothing to say.
But why didn't you say it in the first place?
- Next message: Franz Gnaedinger: "Re: genes and language (Homer, Richard Dawkins)"
- Previous message: Paul J Kriha: "Re: ixnij chelovek?"
- In reply to: dayn: "s"
- Next in thread: André Keshav: "Re: s"
- Reply: André Keshav: "Re: s"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
