Re: genes and language (Homer, Richard Dawkins)
grapheus_at_www.com
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Alexei A. Frounze: "Re: language trainer - kind of thing"
- Previous message: KaGu:-}: "Re: language trainer - kind of thing"
- In reply to: Franz Gnaedinger: "Re: genes and language (Homer, Richard Dawkins)"
- Next in thread: josephus: "Re: genes and language (Homer, Richard Dawkins)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Feb 2005 03:02:20 -0800
The PATENTED SLANDERER and IGNORANT Franz Fridolin Gnaedinger goes on
with his REPEATED STUPID and NASTY ASSERTIONS : that I, grapheus, would
be J. Faucounau, that the Glozel Inscriptions are "generally considered
as fakes" (One may wonder which books and papers he has read on the
subject ! Because, of course, he THE SUPER-IGNORAMUS has obviously
never heard about the thermoluminescence datings made by two
laboratories in Danmark and England ... ), that J.F. "wishes to be
him", etc.
The MOST ARROGANT assertion reaches really to paranoia : how could a
"serious scholar", who has published tens of papers in professional
journals (like the "Revue d'Assyriologie", for instance) could "WISH"
to be a BUM like Franz Fridolin ?...
<http://minilien.com/?aIV4YmYTQ6>
grapheus
Franz Gnaedinger wrote:
> Yesterday I mentioned the Glozel inscriptions, which
> had been claimed to be of Magdalenian origin, but are
> generally considered fakes. The first inscriptions were
> on baked clay. An archaeologist pointed out that there
> was no baked clay in the Magdalenium. Whereupon all the
> subsequent "finds" were on unbaked clay ... I share the
> general view on the Glozel inscriptions; I have a right
> to say that in sci.archaeology and sci.lang, and the
> more so as I found a new argument in favor of the general
> opinion (early writing wasn't simply and plain linear,
> as shows the case of the Vinca script).
>
> This message is a warning to my perpetual molestor Marie
> Jean Faucounau alias grapheus aka fr.soc.histoire.antique
> aka circle aka Alan_Crozier, all messages sent via the
> anonymized e-mail address grapheus@www.com. Alan_Crozier
> is not identical with the poster Alan Crozier, whose name
> was abused by Marie Jean Faucounau grapheus@www.com.
>
> Marie Jean Fauconau's pseudonym circle was part of my
> first e-mail address, and Deja used circle for my name,
> although I did not use it as a pseudonym, I signed every
> post of mine by my actual name Franz Gnaedinger.
>
> Why did Marie Jean Fauconau use my Deja "name" circle?
> Perhaps the strangest he wrote under this pseudonym was
> "Franz Gnaedinger aka Jean Fauconau" = Franz Gnaedinger,
> also known as Jean Fauconau. Nau nau nau, he is not my
> alter ego.
>
> He wishes to be me, but he is not me. He wishes to get
> my support, but he does not get my support. Which is why
> he must go on molesting me for ever.
>
- Next message: Alexei A. Frounze: "Re: language trainer - kind of thing"
- Previous message: KaGu:-}: "Re: language trainer - kind of thing"
- In reply to: Franz Gnaedinger: "Re: genes and language (Homer, Richard Dawkins)"
- Next in thread: josephus: "Re: genes and language (Homer, Richard Dawkins)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|