Re: All agglutinative languages are SOV-ordered?
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 02/15/05
- Previous message: John Swindle: "Re: Is Esperanto Grammer based on Turkish?"
- In reply to: John A Rea: "Re: All agglutinative languages are SOV-ordered?"
- Next in thread: Joachim Pense: "Re: All agglutinative languages are SOV-ordered?"
- Reply: Joachim Pense: "Re: All agglutinative languages are SOV-ordered?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:17:50 +1000
John A Rea wrote:
> Aha. As I recall the French word for "deep" is "profond".
>
> What's the French word for "shallow"?
Y'en a pas. We say "pas profond" or "peu profond".
It's like Bislama. There is no word for "bad".
They say "nokut" (not good). And, come to think
of it... so does Esperanto!
- Previous message: John Swindle: "Re: Is Esperanto Grammer based on Turkish?"
- In reply to: John A Rea: "Re: All agglutinative languages are SOV-ordered?"
- Next in thread: Joachim Pense: "Re: All agglutinative languages are SOV-ordered?"
- Reply: Joachim Pense: "Re: All agglutinative languages are SOV-ordered?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]