Re: git
From: Mike Lyle (mike_lyle_uk_at_REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk)
Date: 02/20/05
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Crossposting [was: Re: Traditional gender-free "he" [was: Re: "16 and 276 are 292"? No. [was: Re: Lack of vocabulary in English?]]]"
- Previous message: sir694_at_icqmail.com: "Re: Accents and tremas: averiguar (pt)"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: git"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: git"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: git"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:35:20 -0000
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
[...]
> It's amazing how insular some aueisto's are [...]
Straight question: was that typo, nonce-formation, or interesting new
variant I haven't caught up with yet?
The feeling that -a terminations are feminine runs quite deep in
English-speakers. (Conversely, my Queensland relatives always say
"Antonio" for "Antonia".)
Mike.
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Crossposting [was: Re: Traditional gender-free "he" [was: Re: "16 and 276 are 292"? No. [was: Re: Lack of vocabulary in English?]]]"
- Previous message: sir694_at_icqmail.com: "Re: Accents and tremas: averiguar (pt)"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: git"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: git"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: git"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
