Re: basque and circassian
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 02/20/05
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Are contractions a part of speech?"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Crossposting [was: Re: Traditional gender-free "he" [was: Re: "16 and 276 are 292"? No. [was: Re: Lack of vocabulary in English?]]]"
- In reply to: Brian M. Scott: "Re: basque and circassian"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: basque and circassian"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:56:33 GMT
Brian M. Scott wrote:
> > The alleged correlation between genes and language is fraudulent (as I
> > have said in print and as Jacques went to a great deal of trouble to
> > spell out explicitly in an early number of LINGUIST List (I don't know
> > if this link will still get you there, but it's LINGUIST List 3.81 if it
> > doesn't)): http://linguistlist.org/issues/3/3-81.html#1
>
> It works.
That's impressive -- they totally overhauled the LINGUIST List website a
couple of years ago, yet old links still find their destination.
(Actually I clicked it after posting it and found that the ASCII-art of
the tree diagram is somewhat disrupted; they seem to have collapsed the
sequences of space characters.)
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Are contractions a part of speech?"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Crossposting [was: Re: Traditional gender-free "he" [was: Re: "16 and 276 are 292"? No. [was: Re: Lack of vocabulary in English?]]]"
- In reply to: Brian M. Scott: "Re: basque and circassian"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: basque and circassian"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
