Re: Are contractions a part of speech?
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 02/20/05
- Next message: N: "Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: basque and circassian"
- In reply to: Greg Lee: "Re: Are contractions a part of speech?"
- Next in thread: Greg Lee: "Re: Are contractions a part of speech?"
- Reply: Greg Lee: "Re: Are contractions a part of speech?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:58:54 GMT
Greg Lee wrote:
>
> Douglas G. Kilday <fufluns@chorus.net> wrote:
> ...
> > One must be cautious arguing from mobility. Different adverbs have
> > different degrees of mobility.
>
> I was cautious. I implied that a characteristic of adverbs is occurrence
> in several positions, not that adverbs can be put any old place.
>
> ...
> > Someone here didn't eat any food.
> > Someone here did not eat any food.
>
> > I can't imagine "parsing" these differently.
>
> I don't know why. We agreed that "didn't" is one word but "did not" is
> two, didn't we? Doesn't that make it obvious that they're parsed
> differently?
Was a universal definition of "word" provided? (Or is your maxim "I
don't do definitions" to be applied here -- in which case your arguing
about "words" is vacuous?)
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: N: "Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: basque and circassian"
- In reply to: Greg Lee: "Re: Are contractions a part of speech?"
- Next in thread: Greg Lee: "Re: Are contractions a part of speech?"
- Reply: Greg Lee: "Re: Are contractions a part of speech?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]