Re: persian and semitic
From: Neeraj Mathur (neemathur_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Yusuf B Gursey: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Previous message: Yusuf B Gursey: "Re: cube in arabic"
- In reply to: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Reply: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Reply: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:02:42 -0000
"Ruud Harmsen" <realemailseesite01@rudhar.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:j1au11tkequ6m7uaqebh0ksgkghhtehjro@4ax.com...
> Moreover, it is one of simplest conceivable vowel systems given the
> physiology of the human speech organ.
Why, exactly, is it the case that one of the most basic vowels should be
rounded? Or to put it another way, what makes it more natural for back
vowels to be rounded than not, and for front vowels to be unrounded?
Neeraj
- Next message: Yusuf B Gursey: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Previous message: Yusuf B Gursey: "Re: cube in arabic"
- In reply to: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Reply: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Reply: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|