Re: persian and semitic
From: Miguel Carrasquer (mcv_at_wxs.nl)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: Yef: "it's not a dialect, it's not an accent, it's....what?"
- Previous message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: Ketchup again [was Re: Teaching and Learning English in Hong Kong]"
- In reply to: John Atkinson: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Next in thread: John Atkinson: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Reply: John Atkinson: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:33:56 GMT
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 03:12:08 GMT, "John Atkinson"
<johnacko@bigpond.com> wrote:
>Kabard and other Circassian languages (NW Caucasian) have three levels of
>vowel height, but no contrast of front-back, rounded-unrounded, or length.
>(Some other NW Caucasian languages seem to have only two vowels.)
/@/ and /a/. The abundance of palatalized and labialized
and even labio-palatalized consonants in NW Caucasian
suggests that we're dealing with either a "degenerate"
3-vowel system (*i and *u passed their front-/backness on to
neighbouring consonants, and merged as /@/, while /a/
remained unchanged) or a 6-vowel system (*i, *i: and *u, *u:
labialized/palatalized neighbouring consonants, all short
vowels merged to /@/, and all long ones to /a/). If the
second analysis is correct, it would allow or the
possibility of 1-vowel languages (*/a/ > /@/, */i/ > /@/ +
pal., */u/ > /@/ +lab.).
=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@wxs.nl
- Next message: Yef: "it's not a dialect, it's not an accent, it's....what?"
- Previous message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: Ketchup again [was Re: Teaching and Learning English in Hong Kong]"
- In reply to: John Atkinson: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Next in thread: John Atkinson: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Reply: John Atkinson: "Re: persian and semitic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|