Re: it's not a dialect, it's not an accent, it's....what?
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: 'Would' used for past habitual actions"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: The word "swastika" was mistranslated & created the "swastika myth""
- In reply to: Yef: "Re: it's not a dialect, it's not an accent, it's....what?"
- Next in thread: Tristan Miller: "Re: it's not a dialect, it's not an accent, it's....what?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:24:42 GMT
Yef wrote:
>
> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> > Where did you get that impression?
> >
> > "Perfectly capable"?? Different speech styles are appropriate in
> > different social circumstances.
> >
> > And you don't know what you're talking about.
>
> And you sir are having a hissy fit. Please stop, for decency's sake.
If you have no facts behind your prejudices, kindly refrain from posting
your prejudices here.
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: 'Would' used for past habitual actions"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: The word "swastika" was mistranslated & created the "swastika myth""
- In reply to: Yef: "Re: it's not a dialect, it's not an accent, it's....what?"
- Next in thread: Tristan Miller: "Re: it's not a dialect, it's not an accent, it's....what?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
