Re: Etymology of anthropo-

From: David Wright Sr. (dwrightsr_at_alltel.net)
Date: 03/06/05 

Date: 6 Mar 2005 15:14:41 GMT

"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:422B1845.6939@worldnet.att.net:

>> That's obvious. you start off 'forth' or otherwise you couldn't have
>> gotten to where you are, because you would still be 'back'. ;-)>
>
> How could you start off anything other than first?
>

I got 'forth' 'last' not 'first'. ;-)> 

-- 
David Wright Sr.
Have you ever stopped to think, and
forgot to start again?
To e-mail me, remove 't' from dwrightsr

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Phonemes
    ... Peter T. Daniels: Heinlein is superficial. ... David Wright Sr: The only claim that I am aware of for _Starship Troopers_ ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: "par coeur" origin
    ... Peter T. Daniels wrote: ... linguistics; but you reject the fundamental assumption of linguistics -- ... it was an opinion on what would or would not be regarded as ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: The opposite..
    ... Peter T. Daniels wrote: ... Human Rights. ... There was a war ISTR, ...
    (rec.music.classical)
  • Re: The opposite..
    ... Michael Haslam wrote: ... Peter T. Daniels wrote: ... Human Rights. ...
    (rec.music.classical)
  • Re: "par coeur" origin
    ... Peter T. Daniels wrote: ... that "parenthetical asides" are very, ... linguistics; but you reject the fundamental assumption of linguistics -- ...
    (sci.lang)