Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: Tak To: "Re: Hexagrams [was Re: hypothetical Yangshao calendar (early China)]"
- Previous message: phippsmartin_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Related scripts (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- In reply to: Doug Weller: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Next in thread: phippsmartin_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:51:53 +1000
Doug Weller wrote:
> Why anyone would come into a specialist newsgroup (or 3 in this case) and
> tell people who actually know something about the subject matter of those
> newsgroups that they don't know what they are talking about is a bit
> mystifying.
No, not if the someone is a baby postmodernist cutting his first teeth.
Like Raymond Tallis I think it was wrote somewhere: they have the habit
of using terms of which they have not the faintest understanding.
It's like those who are fond of proving that Basque = Navaho (or
Sumerian = Austronesian). The less they understand, the more
evidence they find.
- Next message: Tak To: "Re: Hexagrams [was Re: hypothetical Yangshao calendar (early China)]"
- Previous message: phippsmartin_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Related scripts (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- In reply to: Doug Weller: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Next in thread: phippsmartin_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|