Re: syllepsis?
From: Ron Hardin (rhhardin_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 03/10/05
- Next message: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Previous message: Jacques Guy: "Re: syllepsis?"
- In reply to: Neeraj Mathur: "Re: syllepsis?"
- Next in thread: Neeraj Mathur: "Re: syllepsis?"
- Reply: Neeraj Mathur: "Re: syllepsis?"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: syllepsis?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:49:38 GMT
Neeraj Mathur wrote:
> > ``Should or intends to regulate'' is wrong, but you might think it
> > would work, ``regulate'' being properly non-finite. Something
> > prevents the coordination, though.
>
> Slightly related, perhaps: what do you think of phrases such as 'The method
> works well with some, not at all with others'?
>
> Neeraj Mathur
It sounds okay to me, with a pause for the missing conjunction.
``Should, or intends to, regulate'' would pass my filter; but I think
it's still syllepsis actually, with a disagreement whether ``regulate''
is a to-infinitive or a bare infinitive. But it's sort of formal, suggesting
a cut-and-paste alternative anyway.
-- Ron Hardin rhhardin@mindspring.com On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
- Next message: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Previous message: Jacques Guy: "Re: syllepsis?"
- In reply to: Neeraj Mathur: "Re: syllepsis?"
- Next in thread: Neeraj Mathur: "Re: syllepsis?"
- Reply: Neeraj Mathur: "Re: syllepsis?"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: syllepsis?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]