Piraha, Uoiauai (was: Seen on alt.language.artificial)
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 03/12/05
- Previous message: phippsmartin_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- In reply to: António Marques: "Re: Seen on alt.language.artificial"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Piraha, Uoiauai (was: Seen on alt.language.artificial)"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Piraha, Uoiauai (was: Seen on alt.language.artificial)"
- Reply: António Marques: "Re: Piraha, Uoiauai"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:24:47 +1000
António Marques wrote:
>
> Jacques Guy wrote:
>
> > If it smells like a hoax, feels like a hoax, looks like
> > a hoax,sounds like a hoax... what is it?
> Ah, but it's a *poor* hoax.
When I did my PhD I was tempted to invent the language
which was the topic of my thesis. Almost nothing was known
about it. My thesis supervisors even doubted that it was
Austronesian. But I decided that it would be too much
hard work. Much easier to learn and describe the real
language. If I had made it up, however, I would have
made it internally consistent, not like _this_. I gave
a few examples of Piraha inconsistencies on the Voynich
group (two messages, which you'll find half-way down
the first page of Google answers to "piraha").
So far I have come across six texts, two of which
are practically still unanalyzed (follow the links
I give in my message at voynich.net). After 25 years
of field work, that's a bit... slim.
> So poor indeed that one thinks it can't be a
> real hoax!
Take a look at those texts:
"http://web.archive.org/web/20001009234649/http://amazonling.linguist.pitt.edu/Martins.html"
"http://web.archive.org/web/20001009234649/http://amazonling.linguist.pitt.edu/Opisi.html"
"http://web.archive.org/web/20001009234649/http://amazonling.linguist.pitt.edu/kato.html"
"http://web.archive.org/web/20001009234649/http://amazonling.linguist.pitt.edu/spirits.html"
"http://web.archive.org/web/20001009234649/http://amazonling.linguist.pitt.edu/anaconda.html"
"http://lings.ln.man.ac.uk/info/staff/DE/panther.pdf"
And then, have a look at the phonemic statement:
"http://web.archive.org/web/20001009114233/amazonling.linguist.pitt.edu/lang.html"
And at the "dictionary"
"http://web.archive.org/web/20001109203800/amazonling.linguist.pitt.edu/dictionary.html"
Sure, it warns you that "this is a preliminary dictionary". Pity,
because if it was
anywhere near a "more complete" dictionary Piraha could boast not only
the smallest
phonemic inventory, but also the smallest vocabulary.
As for the other one, Voiauai or Uoiauai in Brazil "which consists
only of 7 vowels and has no consonants", I found the source of the
mystery. It turns up in various collection of word oddities
as one of the longest words composed entirely of vowels.
Some bright bulb apparently figured out that the language
itself had seven vowels and no consonants. By that
reasoning French has only three consonants and two vowels.
- Previous message: phippsmartin_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- In reply to: António Marques: "Re: Seen on alt.language.artificial"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Piraha, Uoiauai (was: Seen on alt.language.artificial)"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Piraha, Uoiauai (was: Seen on alt.language.artificial)"
- Reply: António Marques: "Re: Piraha, Uoiauai"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|