Re: Scurry vs Scuttle [Was: "Gender-free masculine pronoun"? etc]
From: Steve Hayes (hayesmstw_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: Scribal inconsistencies in Syllabic Writing"
- Previous message: Neeraj Mathur: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- In reply to: Matti Lamprhey: "Scurry vs Scuttle [Was: "Gender-free masculine pronoun"? etc]"
- Next in thread: the Omrud: "Re: "Gender-free masculine pronoun"? Absurd. [was: Re: Crossposting[was: Re: Traditional gender-free "he" [was: Re: "16 and 276 are 292"?No. [was: Re: Lack of vocabulary in English?]]]]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 02:34:49 +0200
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:12:41 -0000, "Matti Lamprhey"
<matti@official-totally-reversed.com> wrote:
>"Ross Howard" <gguiri@yahoo.com> wrote...
>>
>> The only [rates] I've ever seen, four or five during my ten years in
>> London, were all scurrying* along the third rail in tube stations,
>> probably saying "Don't try this at home".
>>
>> * ObAUE: I doubted between "scurry" and "scuttle" there. Opinions?
>
>For me, this comes down to gait. Scuttling implies a gait where the
>legs on each side are moving together, whilst scurrying labels one
>where they're opposed. So I think rats scurry.
Besides which, I've never heard of scurry***.
-- Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/stevesig.htm E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
- Next message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: Scribal inconsistencies in Syllabic Writing"
- Previous message: Neeraj Mathur: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- In reply to: Matti Lamprhey: "Scurry vs Scuttle [Was: "Gender-free masculine pronoun"? etc]"
- Next in thread: the Omrud: "Re: "Gender-free masculine pronoun"? Absurd. [was: Re: Crossposting[was: Re: Traditional gender-free "he" [was: Re: "16 and 276 are 292"?No. [was: Re: Lack of vocabulary in English?]]]]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]