Re: to unprepare
From: Ron Hardin (rhhardin_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: grapheus_at_www.com: "Re: Scribal inconsistencies in Syllabic Writing"
- Previous message: Horace LaBadie: "Re: to unprepare"
- In reply to: Ekkehard Dengler: "Re: to unprepare"
- Next in thread: Greg Lee: "Re: to unprepare"
- Reply: Greg Lee: "Re: to unprepare"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:54:44 GMT
Ekkehard Dengler wrote:
> I can't help feeling you're going out of your way to read an absurd meaning
> into a sentence that isn't necessarily absurd. If your intuitive reaction is
> to reject the sentence, then fine, but I'd disagree with the notion that a
> reasonable interpretation can be rendered impossible by the possibility of
> an implausible alternative one.
The idea is to account for the intuitive reaction; the intuitive reaction is
what makes language work.
It may be that the intuitive reaction doesn't need an accounting, but then
linguistics isn't needed either, and you might be interested in accounting
anyway.
In this case my analysis is that the semantics produces a conflict that is
is felt as a grammar mistake.
-- Ron Hardin rhhardin@mindspring.com On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
- Next message: grapheus_at_www.com: "Re: Scribal inconsistencies in Syllabic Writing"
- Previous message: Horace LaBadie: "Re: to unprepare"
- In reply to: Ekkehard Dengler: "Re: to unprepare"
- Next in thread: Greg Lee: "Re: to unprepare"
- Reply: Greg Lee: "Re: to unprepare"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]