Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)
From: Brian M. Scott (b.scott_at_csuohio.edu)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Teaching by Translation: to take"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: accents"
- In reply to: Jacques Guy: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Next in thread: John Atkinson: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:42:13 -0500
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:42:37 +1000, Jacques Guy
<jguy@alphalink.com.au> wrote in
<news:4248c09e@news.alphalink.com.au> in
sci.lang,sci.anthropology:
> Brian M. Scott wrote:
>> Ahem. Every tree *is* a connected graph (though not
>> conversely).
> Yes, so much for me. But you must have guessed what
> I meant: a fully connected graph where every node
> is connected to every node.
Ah, a complete graph. No, I actually didn't guess; I
thought that you just meant a connected graph with at least
one cycle (hence not a tree).
[...]
Brian
- Next message: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Teaching by Translation: to take"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: accents"
- In reply to: Jacques Guy: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Next in thread: John Atkinson: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|