Re: accents
From: Ruud Harmsen (realemailseesite01_at_rudhar.com.invalid)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Galician, Castillian and Portuguese"
- Previous message: António Marques: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- In reply to: Iain: "Re: accents"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: accents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:21:00 +0200
29 Mar 2005 06:53:31 -0800: "Iain" <iain_inkster@hotmail.com>: in
sci.lang:
>Don't you think that if Standard Written English didn't exist, spoken
>English would have evolved further beyond recognition?
I doubt it. Just this last week I found examples of texts 400 or 500
years old, in Dutch and Portuguese, that have changed very little, and
are still comprehensible. A large proportion of those periods the
majority of these language communities were illiterate. So I think the
influence of the written language on the spoken language has been very
limited, and it hasn't slowed change. Change is slow with or without
written language.
>Or perhaps the
>"recognition" in question is provided by writing.
Possibly. Now, but not in the recent past.
>Writing is an axiom reminder than the /t/ sound at the end of "chased"
>has the same semantic function as a written "-ed" -- our mental image
>of the "-ed" distinguishes "chased" from "chaste" in our minds.
In the mind of those who can read, yes. Until recently, they were a
small minority.
-- Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com/
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Galician, Castillian and Portuguese"
- Previous message: António Marques: "Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- In reply to: Iain: "Re: accents"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: accents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]