Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: benlizross <benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 07:47:18 +1200
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> Brian M. Scott wrote:
>
> > >> If you are one of the few speakers who distinguish
> > >> such pairs as "aural" and "oral", "for" and "four",
> > >> "for" and "fore", "horse" and "hoarse", "or" and "oar",
> > >> "or" and "ore", then you use [O] for the first and [o]
> > >> for the second word in each pair; otherwise, you use
> > >> [O] for both.
> >
> > > It's been claimed that that's true for some limited US
> > > areas, but no famous person has ever been adduced as an
> > > example of such a speaker that could be studied.
> >
> > So what?
>
> So I've never heard the supposed difference exemplified.
>
Celebrity Dialectology?
Ross Clark
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- References:
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Colin Fine
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Colin Fine
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Colin Fine
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English compared to other European languages
- Prev by Date: Re: English compared to other European languages
- Next by Date: Re: help! looking for a pdf book.
- Previous by thread: Re: English compared to other European languages
- Next by thread: Re: English compared to other European languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|