Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:29:33 GMT
Colin Fine wrote:
> > If I write
> >
> > â?*a,b,c â?? G (a âS? b) âS? c = a âS? (b âS? c)
> > â??e â?? G: â?*a â?? G (a âS? e) = (e âS? a) = a
> > â?*a â?? G: â??z â?? G (a âS? z) = (z âS? a) = e
> >
> > This is a translation, but not into a language. It has no phonology or
> > morphology. It has syntax, but the elements of that syntax are utterly
> > different from those of a language. And it has semantics only in the
> > transferred sense I spoke of earlier.
> >
>
> I realised after I posted this that my argument is partly wrong: the
> lack of phonology and morphology do not demonstrate that it is not a
> language (consider sign languages).
> The crucial point remains, however, that it does not have syntax or
> semantics in the way a natural language does.
Perhaps the most crucial property of human language is (Hockett)
"duality of patterning" or (Martinet) "double articulation." Meaningless
units are organized into meaningful units (the -emic principle, not to
be confused with the anthropologists' terms "emic" and "etic" that seem
to get it backward).
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- From: Colin Fine
- Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- References:
- _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- From: JHM
- Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- From: Colin Fine
- Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- From: Colin Fine
- Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- From: Colin Fine
- Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- From: Colin Fine
- _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- Prev by Date: Re: Universality of Interjections?
- Next by Date: Re: English Use of "Fixed" in Downing Street Memo
- Previous by thread: Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- Next by thread: Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|