Re: supermarket cashier again
- From: António Marques <m.ap@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:51:21 +0100
rrhersh@xxxxxxxx wrote:
"Operatunity", I take it then, is a British production?
Your original posting was sadly deficient in providing
context.
"in the US," "Pop Idol," and "Tescos" are all unmistak(e)able
markers of UKism.
I'll give you 1.5 out of 3: 'Tescos' is a dead giveaway, but
'in the US', even combined with an English-language title,
still allows an Australian source, for instance.
Then there's that thing called memory: anyone to whom the
information is interesting must have followed the recent thread
and know what it's about.
Only if you are using 'must' in the sense of 'might'.
I honestly believe no one else cares whether the gal bagged the goods
or not.
--
am
laurus : rhodophyta : brezoneg : smalltalk : stargate
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: supermarket cashier again
... markers of UKism. ... the US', even combined with an English-language title, still allows an Australian source, for instance. ... (sci.lang) - Re: supermarket cashier again
... > Brian M. Scott wrote: ... >>> markers of UKism. ... >> the US', even combined with an English-language title, still allows ... (sci.lang) - Re: supermarket cashier again
... >> posting was sadly deficient in providing context. ... > UKism. ... 'in the US', even combined with an English-language title, ... still allows an Australian source, ... (sci.lang) |
|