Re: Luxenberg's critique
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:51:17 GMT
M.S.M. Saifullah wrote:
> > I also said that epigraphy is more conservative than manuscripts, so
> > mss. may have been dotting merrily away for generations before
> > stonecarvers took up the innovation.
>
> May be. But in Arabic epigraphy dotting appears earlier than the
> manuscripts.
Sigh. The earliest Arabic inscriptions are older than the earliest
manuscripts, and the earliest papyri from the Cairo Geniza (dating to
within a decade or so of the Prophet's lifetime) have some dotting.
(They are mundane commercial documents and are probably earlier than the
writing-down of the Qur'an.)
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Re: Luxenberg's critique
- From: Yusuf B Gursey
- Re: Luxenberg's critique
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Luxenberg's critique
- From: M.S.M. Saifullah
- Re: Luxenberg's critique
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Luxenberg's critique
- From: M.S.M. Saifullah
- Re: Luxenberg's critique
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Luxenberg's critique
- From: M.S.M. Saifullah
- Re: Luxenberg's critique
- Prev by Date: Re: Phonemes
- Next by Date: Re: the 't' in 'tsunami'
- Previous by thread: Re: Luxenberg's critique
- Next by thread: Re: Luxenberg's critique
- Index(es):