Re: Phonemes
- From: "David Wright Sr." <dwrightsr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
"John Atkinson" <johnacko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:q4Ate.24402$F7.24099
@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
Thanks for your response. I didn't choose the languages exemplified. Those
were given in an earlier response to my general question.
(snip)
> So, the answer to your question seems to be: Yes, I think they would.
>
> Physiologically, at any rate. Neurologically, who knows whether the
> wiring is complex enough to handle so many?
>
Can you clarify a little more on this? I'm not sure how physiologically vs.
neurologically would be different?
David W.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Phonemes
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Phonemes
- References:
- Phonemes
- From: David Wright Sr.
- Re: Phonemes
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Phonemes
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Phonemes
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Phonemes
- From: David Wright Sr.
- Re: Phonemes
- From: John Atkinson
- Phonemes
- Prev by Date: Re: Phonemes
- Next by Date: Re: Is language development evolutionary, or designed by the culture?
- Previous by thread: Re: Phonemes
- Next by thread: Re: Phonemes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|