Re: Letters with **three** cases?
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 01:42:05 GMT
Nigel Greenwood wrote:
>
> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> >
> > Perhaps because it turned out that the victims of ita never learned to
> > spell what they called TO (traditional orthography).
>
> Could you give us some references to this outcome, please? I don't
> doubt what you say: it's just that I'm not familiar with the follow-up
> studies.
Purely anecdotal. Either there were no studies, or else they were
suppressed; but the few ita victims I have met admit that they can't
spell.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Letters with **three** cases?
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: Letters with **three** cases?
- References:
- Re: Letters with **three** cases?
- From: Nigel Greenwood
- Re: Letters with **three** cases?
- Prev by Date: Re: Letters with **three** cases?
- Next by Date: the enthusiastic publicist
- Previous by thread: Re: Letters with **three** cases?
- Next by thread: Re: Letters with **three** cases?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|