Re: verb gender
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:14:38 GMT
António Marques wrote:
>
> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> >>> "Anytime an animal shortens out power at a substation, we offer
> >>> our condolences to the animal," he said.
> >>>
> >>> which has to have been edited by a woman.
>
> 'Has to have'? You talk like dat?
Nothing wrong with that. Quite different from "must have been."
> >> Explain yourself.
> >
> > I think he thinks a man couldn't possibly have said "shortens out"
> > for "shorts out," (...)
>
> Why, for the benefit of the english-impaired?
Eh?
> >> On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
> >
> > Yet he proves it every day.
>
> Risking offending any unnoticed exception, no interesting threads
> began while you were away. OTOH, you managed to miss the oh so
> tiresome discussion on Uralic.
Oh, it was still here in all its glory.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: verb gender
- From: António Marques
- Re: verb gender
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: verb gender
- References:
- verb gender
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: verb gender
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: verb gender
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: verb gender
- From: António Marques
- verb gender
- Prev by Date: Croatian dialect 'brek'
- Next by Date: Re: Will 7-7 become a word because of the bombing?
- Previous by thread: Re: verb gender
- Next by thread: Re: verb gender
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading