Re: Why Chi and Not Xi for X in Latin Script?
- From: Javi <poziNOSPAMyo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:24:23 GMT
António Marques wrote:
John Lawler wrote:
In Latin, there was no special ps letter, but the idea of using one letter to represent ks was still around, and still useful; my guess is that the continuation of the tradition of /ks/ but not /ps/ was due to relative frequency in Latin.
IIrc, psi was introduced at a later time for such words as princeps,
The letter, its aspect like a mirrored C, was invented by emperor Claudius in the first century AD, but, as you say, it wasn't much used after the death of Claudius.
but didn't catch on, probably for the low frequency you mentioned, or maybe because the readers/writers base was larger and didn't bow to change.
The second seems more likely, IMHO.
-- Javi .
- References:
- Why Chi and Not Xi for X in Latin Script?
- From: Dennis
- Re: Why Chi and Not Xi for X in Latin Script?
- From: John Lawler
- Re: Why Chi and Not Xi for X in Latin Script?
- From: António Marques
- Why Chi and Not Xi for X in Latin Script?
- Prev by Date: Re: WuBi, Hanzi, Unihan, study, Chinese
- Next by Date: Re: Ural-Altaic
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Chi and Not Xi for X in Latin Script?
- Next by thread: Re: Why Chi and Not Xi for X in Latin Script?
- Index(es):