sci.lang

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Cangjie on Windows
  • From: ekkilu
• Re: 3ayiz vs 3awiz
  • From: Alexander Magidow
• Re: 3ayiz vs 3awiz
  • From: Alexander Magidow
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dalei0852
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: 3ayiz vs 3awiz
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: is "very" an adverb?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: is "very" an adverb?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: 3ayiz vs 3awiz
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: eye-popping genetive construction in English
  • From: Joe Fineman
• Language news
  • From: vili
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: eye-popping genetive construction in English
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: eye-popping genetive construction in English
  • From: Nigel Greenwood
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: eye-popping genetive construction in English
  • From: Arne Dehli Halvorsen
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Jarel Deaton
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: lorad474
• Re: 3ayiz vs 3awiz
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: eye-popping genetive construction in English
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: 3ayiz vs 3awiz
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Jarel Deaton
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: s.libri@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: is "very" an adverb?
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: 3ayiz vs 3awiz
  • From: Alan
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Indo-European Origins and Geography
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: "The semantics of your thinking are all wrong."
  • From: Tom Breton
• eye-popping genetive construction in English
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: is "very" an adverb?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: is "very" an adverb?
  • From: lsulky
• Re: is "very" an adverb?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• is "very" an adverb?
  • From: lsulky
• Re: "The semantics of your thinking are all wrong."
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• "The semantics of your thinking are all wrong."
  • From: linq936
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: axel
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: Cangjiemonics
  • From: ekkilu
• Re: Cangjiemonics
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: James S. Singleton
• Collocations and generative-transformational rules (of English grammar)
  • From: Tom
• Re: 3ayiz vs 3awiz
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: axel
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: axel
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: O-V R:nen
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Nigel Greenwood
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: 3ayiz vs 3awiz
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Cangjiemonics
  • From: ekkilu
• Cangjiemonics
  • From: ekkilu
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Alan
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: xah
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Alan
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: When does pFU *nt become Hungarian *d?
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: Nigel Greenwood
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: James S. Singleton
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: suikyou
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: O-V R:nen
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: James S. Singleton
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Tak To
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: axel
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: I think that French verb conjugation is as simple as, if not simpler than, that of English (no kidding!) - see www.sixpourcent.com
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Hithqattel???
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: ``Not to be ... is to be''
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Des Small
• Re: When does pFU *nt become Hungarian *d?
  • From: Tapani Salminen
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: axel
• Re: ``Not to be ... is to be''
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: ``Not to be ... is to be''
  • From: Ron Hardin
• 'Find' in Castillian and Valencian
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Cantonese slang?
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: a + r. in Sanskrit
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: xah
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: When does pFU *nt become Hungarian *d?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Cantonese slang?
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• Re: Hithqattel???
  • From: Ted Hendricks
• An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: xah
• Re: Hithqattel???
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• Hithqattel???
  • From: Robert Bigelow
• Re: An Example in Comrie's "Tense"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Hithqattel???
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Hithqattel???
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Cangjie on Windows
  • From: ekkilu
• Re: Cangjie on Windows
  • From: ekkilu
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping
• "substitute" (was Re: Italian/Romance Tenses question & 'sc')
  • From: Arnold Zwicky
• Re: When does pFU *nt become Hungarian *d?
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: ``Not to be ... is to be''
  • From: John Lawler
• Re: Cangjie on Windows
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Cangjie on Windows
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: When does pFU *nt become Hungarian *d?
  • From: Tapani Salminen
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cangjie on Windows
  • From: Dylan Sung
• ``Not to be ... is to be''
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Cangjie on Windows
  • From: ekkilu
• Cangjie on Windows
  • From: ekkilu
• Re: Translation of Cantonese (?) dialog in movie "Chinatown"
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Translation of Cantonese (?) dialog in movie "Chinatown"
  • From: alaskano
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: xah
• Re: When does pFU *nt become Hungarian *d?
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Tak To
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• Re: What's the difference between two words: faculty and facility?
  • From: JohnHalloran
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: GWB
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: xah
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: dalubwika
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Logos demeur
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: Toni Keskitalo
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Jarel Deaton
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• When does pFU *nt become Hungarian *d?
  • From: Christopher Culver
• Re: port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Alan
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Alan
• Re: Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Letter frequency of Chinese pinyin
  • From: dungping5
• port l>r and ital l>i change
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Arianrhod
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: J. W. Love
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: J. W. Love
• Re: What's the difference between two words: faculty and facility?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: What's the difference between two words: faculty and facility?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Alan
• What's the difference between two words: faculty and facility?
  • From: seoulbi_net
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Alan
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Christian Weisgerber
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: franlorin
• Re: a + r. in Sanskrit
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "make them tick":what this mean?
  • From: Joe Fineman
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• My Transcriptions of a Papuan Language for which little data has been published
  • From: Jarel Deaton
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: "make them tick":what this mean?
  • From: Nigel Greenwood
• Re: The French word hé
  • From: benlizross
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: lenny
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Ben Zimmer
• Re: "make them tick":what this mean?
  • From: Geoff
• Re: a + r. in Sanskrit
  • From: Allan Adler
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: António Marques
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Alan
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: benlizross
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: tommy
• Re: a + r. in Sanskrit
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Ben Zimmer
• Re: "make them tick":what this mean?
  • From: Nute
• "make them tick":what this mean?
  • From: linq936
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Christopher Kerr
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: J. W. Love
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: J. W. Love
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: lenny
• Re: what language is this mark?
  • From: y . euldede
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• Re: a + r. in Sanskrit
  • From: Allan Adler
• Re: a + r. in Sanskrit
  • From: Allan Adler
• Re: a + r. in Sanskrit
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Logos demeur
  • From: Spiritual Anarchist
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
• Re: Tribal language has no words for tales about imaginary beings
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Tribal language has no words for tales about imaginary beings
  • From: J. W. Love
• Re: Logos demeur
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Logos demeur
  • From: Mike
• Re: Gagnez de l'argent sur le net
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: pierre.levy
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: Gagnez de l'argent sur le net
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: tommy
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Esben I.
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: a + r. in Sanskrit
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• a + r. in Sanskrit
  • From: Allan Adler
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Spiritual Anarchist
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: Spiritual Anarchist
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: grapheus
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: grapheus
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: nin
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Finnish Numerals
  • From: O-V R:nen
• Re: 15 lexical items most resistant to borrowing?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Finnish Numerals
  • From: Britney
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: piotrpanek
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 15 lexical items most resistant to borrowing?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: lenny
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: grapheus
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: 15 lexical items most resistant to borrowing?
  • From: benlizross
• Re: 15 lexical items most resistant to borrowing?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Gagnez de l'argent sur le net
  • From: Esben I.
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Christopher Culver
• Re: How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• How do you say "ouch!" in other languages?
  • From: Nute
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: Helmut Richter
• 15 lexical items most resistant to borrowing?
  • From: Christopher Culver
• Re: scripts
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Learning Finnish
  • From: Arianrhod
• Re: Deciphering an English word
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Christian Weisgerber
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Gerrit Vicin
• Re: scripts
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Gerrit Vicin
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: prepositions
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: scripts
  • From: Nigel Greenwood
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: scripts
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: scripts
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: 'niggardly' redux [Was: All y'all, y'all...]
  • From: y . euldede
• Re: scripts
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: scripts
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: scripts
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: scripts
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: scripts
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: scripts
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: scripts
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: scripts
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Is this English right?
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Is this English right?
  • From: linq936
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: scripts
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: scripts
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: marcfrisch
• Re: scripts
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: scripts
  • From: Nigel Greenwood
• Re: scripts
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: scripts
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: andrew_woode
• Re: scripts
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: scripts
  • From: Christopher Culver
• Re: scripts
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: scripts
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: It-attraction
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Christian Weisgerber
• Re: scripts
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: scripts
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: It-attraction
  • From: John Lawler
• scripts
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: It-attraction
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: grapheus
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: lenny
• It-attraction
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Bible Translations
  • From: Dennis
• Re: The French word hé
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Pronunciation of the names Kjeldahl and Jablonksi
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Bible Translations
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: Bible Translations
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: tommy
• Re: Bible Translations
  • From: Esben I.
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: Wugi
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: The French word hé
  • From: benlizross
• Re: Bible Translations
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: The French word hé
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Pete Boardman
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Bible Translations
  • From: baal
• Learning Finnish
  • From: Arianrhod
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: The French word hé
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: SL
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: Wugi
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: Helmut Richter
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: lenny
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: carla
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Italian grammar
  • From: Nigel Greenwood
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Abdullah Konushevci
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Jarel Deaton
• The French word hé
  • From: Jarel Deaton
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Italian grammar
  • From: lenny
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugriclanguages
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Invention or Evolution
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: aslanski2002
• Re: Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugriclanguages
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugriclanguages
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Prepositions and postpositions in IE languages
  • From: cmtlevy
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Order of Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention or Evolution (was: Invention of the Alphabet)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Order of Alphabet
  • From: markwh04
• Re: URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: scooterm
• Re: prepositions
  • From: lsulky
• Invention or Evolution (was: Invention of the Alphabet)
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Origin of language: spontaneous emergence of language.
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: Juuitchan
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Keith Goeringer
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Barbara Need
• Re: Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Wugi
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Difference between passive and active voices
  • From: Juuitchan
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Juuitchan
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Arnold Zwicky
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: SL
• Re: Map of language families
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Map of language families
  • From: SL
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: Wiktor S.
• whats the common root of the triple (or quadruple) meaning of the word "right" ?
  • From: pslant
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugric languages
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: yet
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: yet
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Royalty struck
  • From: António Marques
• cleft / pseudo-cleft or what?
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Miguel Carrasquer
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugriclanguages
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: yet
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugric languages
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Jallan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugric languages
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugric languages
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugric languages
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: Jeff Whittaker
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Alexander Magidow
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugric languages
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Ladyboy [was: Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: Lukas Pietsch
• Ladyboy [was: Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: benlizross
• Re: prepositions
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: But this, but that
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Hungarian vs. Finnish/Estonian as "typical" Finno-Ugric languages
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Tretjim budesh'?
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Why ugrorum
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: But this, but that
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Amazing articles about Life and Universe
  • From: Dennis
• Re: prepositions
  • From: Tom Breton
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Feminine handwriting
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: nandodick
• Feminine handwriting
  • From: Juuitchan
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Alexander Magidow
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Greek surnames
  • From: Lukas Pietsch
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Greek surnames
  • From: nin
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Nathan
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: But this, but that
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: benlizross
• Re: But this, but that
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: aslanski2002
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Arnold Zwicky
• Re: yet
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Amazing articles about Life and Universe
  • From: Dale Evans
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Alexander Magidow
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Wheel of Fortune in other languages
  • From: dungping5
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Jallan
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Germania
  • From: piotrpanek
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: But this, but that
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: But this, but that
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar
  • From: Allan Adler
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: aslanski2002
• Re: Wheel of Fortune in other languages
  • From: marcfrisch
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Jordi
• Re: Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar
  • From: Nath Rao
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: benlizross
• Re: Wheel of Fortune in other languages
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: But this, but that
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Javi
• Re: Wheel of Fortune in other languages
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: But this, but that
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar
  • From: Allan Adler
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Javi
• Wheel of Fortune in other languages
  • From: dungping5
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Nathan
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Jordi
• Re: Country names with and without "the"
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Country names with and without "the"
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: yet
  • From: kleinecke
• Re: Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: andrew_woode
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Why ugrorum
  • From: Colloquially Ineffable
• Re: Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• But this, but that
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Country names with and without "the"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: António Marques
• Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar
  • From: Allan Adler
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Keith Goeringer
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Country names with and without "the"
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Country names with and without "the"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: yet
  • From: kleinecke
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: andrew_woode
• Re: Country names with and without "the"
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Country names with and without "the"
  • From: Nathan
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Seo Cwen
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Historical languages in historical countries- Linguisitcs of folk, grammarian, e
  • From: allingus
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Ken Berry
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Padraic Brown
• Re: Indirect Objects
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: yet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Seeking Audio Recordings of Pure Disfluencies
  • From: scooterm
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: yet
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Nathan
• Re: yet
  • From: kleinecke
• Indirect Objects
  • From: Seo Cwen
• Re: yet
  • From: kleinecke
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: benlizross
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: benlizross
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Tom Breton
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Tom Breton
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: yet
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Padraic Brown
• yet
  • From: kleinecke
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Nathan
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: André Keshave
• Cuban final "s" and the Buena Vista social club
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• LOOKING FOR TRANSLATORS EN->ES, FR->ES, EN->DE, FR->DE
  • From: gerard.deangeli
• Re: Irish _theid teidh_?
  • From: Lars Braesicke
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Irish _theid teidh_?
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Italian TV Channels
  • From: lenny
• Re: Italian TV Channels
  • From: garabik-news-2005-05
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: aslanski2002
• Re: Marking Clauses
  • From: aslanski2002
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: aslanski2002
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Why do some languages roll their "R" sound?
  • From: aine_canby
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Alexander Magidow
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Nigel Greenwood
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Compound Christian names in US and elsewhere
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Juuitchan
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Juuitchan
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Juuitchan
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Juuitchan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: André Keshave
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: André Keshave
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Irish _theid teidh_?
  • From: Lars Braesicke
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Alexander Magidow
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Compound Christian names in US and elsewhere
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Why ugrorum
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: TH
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Mandarin Chinese input - wubi or zhengma?
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: nin
• Re: Why ugrorum
  • From: Nuke_dukem
• Iraqi road sign?
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: TH
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: Neeraj Mathur
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Mandarin Chinese input - wubi or zhengma?
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Mandarin Chinese input - wubi or zhengma?
  • From: Jer
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: marcfrisch
• Re: Please post similarities between Turkic and Native American
  • From: man_in_black529
• Natural language with least garbage?
  • From: Juuitchan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: G. Leo Sahakian
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: ******** Flame alert ******** [was: Re: "have got" [was: Re: 'ing' form of 'to stymie' (& do any other vbs end in 'ie' pronounced [i]?)]]
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: ******** Flame alert ******** [was: Re: "have got" [was: Re: 'ing' form of 'to stymie' (& do any other vbs end in 'ie' pronounced [i]?)]]
  • From: Charles Riggs
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: G. Leo Sahakian
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: Please post similarities between Turkic and Native American
  • From: Birgit Wegner
• Re: Focus on closed-class words : female bureaucrat-speak
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: G. Leo Sahakian
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: TH
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: TH
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Irish _theid teidh_?
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Aryan
  • From: gilgames
• Irish _theid teidh_?
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: G. Leo Sahakian
• Re: TH
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: G. Leo Sahakian
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: G. Leo Sahakian
• Re: Focus on closed-class words : female bureaucrat-speak
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Please post similarities between Turkic and Native American
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Focus on closed-class words : female bureaucrat-speak
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: TH
  • From: nin
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Italian TV Channels
  • From: Matt Dunford
• Re: Please post similarities between Turkic and Native American
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Why ugrorum
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Please post similarities between Turkic and Native American
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Andre Keshave
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Please post similarities between Turkic and Native American
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Please post similarities between Turkic and Native American
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Please post similarities between Turkic and Native American
  • From: Helmut Richter
• Please post similarities between Turkic and Native American
  • From: Birgit Wegner
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Italian TV Channels
  • From: lenny
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Arnold Zwicky
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Arnold Zwicky
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Arnold Zwicky
• Focus on closed-class words : female bureaucrat-speak
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: O-V R:nen
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: http://www.lituanus.org/2002/02_3_06.htm
  • From: turan*
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: prepositions
  • From: lsulky
• Re: http://www.lituanus.org/2002/02_3_06.htm
  • From: Andreas Prilop
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Greg Lee
• Re: Marking Clauses
  • From: John Lawler
• Re: Semantic content
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Semantic content
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Semantic content
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Mandarin Daily News
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: TH
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: A question to Eugene; Why Finnland is the westermost
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: Artem Baguinski 2015922135
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Semantic content
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Marking Clauses
  • From: Seo Cwen
• Mandarin Daily News
  • From: Sean
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Semantic content
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: TH
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Derivation of Term Abugida
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: TH
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: John Lawler
• Re: TH
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: prepositions
  • From: John Lawler
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Des Small
• Re: languages without verbs?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Barbara Need
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Barbara Need
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Barbara Need
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Joe Fineman
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: O-V R:nen
• Re: TH
  • From: sanlosinst
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Joe Fineman
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: sanlosinst
• languages without verbs?
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: A question to Eugene; Why Finnland is the westermost
  • From: O-V R:nen
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Lukas Pietsch
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: benlizross
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Helmut Richter
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: A question to Eugene; Why Finnland is the westermost
  • From: O-V R:nen
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: Lukas Pietsch
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Geoff
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Eugene Holman
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: G. Leo Sahakian
• Re: understanding ergativity
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: NY Times article on world's languages
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: G. Leo Sahakian
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic
  • From: David Wright Sr.
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic
  • From: Christopher Culver
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic
  • From: David Wright Sr.
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: António Marques
• Re: He, she and it against hem
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Barbara Need
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic
  • From: Christopher Culver
• Re: Semantic content
  • From: António Marques
• Re: NY Times article on world's languages
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Joachim Pense
• understanding ergativity
  • From: Joachim Pense
• [DE] modal verbs
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: TH
  • From: O-V R:nen
• Re: Semantic content
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Helmut Richter
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Croatian dialect 'brek'
  • From: ruffnready
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Helmut Richter
• Re: NY Times article on world's languages
  • From: Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Wiktor S.
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Torsten Poulin
• He, she and it against hem
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: TH
  • From: John Atkinson
• URL: Paper on English spelling reform - the case against in the Internet age
  • From: Christopher Rollason
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Eugene Holman
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Torsten Poulin
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Torsten Poulin
• Re: TH
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Gagnez de l'argent sur le net
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Wiktor S.
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Pierre Jelenc
• Re: TH
  • From: Tor Aschan
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: kleinecke
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Re: TH
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: TH
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: David Wright Sr.
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: António Marques
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Cutting classifications and human nature
  • From: António Marques
• Re: TH
  • From: Eugene Holman
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Keith Goeringer
• Re: TH
  • From: benlizross
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Keith Goeringer
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Eugene Holman
• Re: Cutting classifications and human nature
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cutting classifications and human nature
  • From: Eugene Holman
• Re: Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: TH
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Sob, it's true about uvular R
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• TH
  • From: Ivan Danicic
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Semantic content
  • From: Javi
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: [Hebrew] dagesh qal - special case question
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: [Hebrew] dagesh qal - special case question
  • From: Helmut Richter
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: António Marques
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Eugene Holman
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• prepositions
  • From: lsulky
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: António Marques
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: sam fisher
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Eugene Holman
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Alan
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Des Small
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: e-mails needed...
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: henry alminas
• Re: Slavic - Slavonic (was: Ural-Altaic)
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: e-mails needed...
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: On the knowledge of the reaserched languages
  • From: O-V R:nen
• Re: e-mails needed...
  • From: Pat
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Tommi Nieminen
• Re: [Hebrew] dagesh qal - special case question
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: trevelyan
• Re: ISO age-graded vocabulary lists
  • From: david
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: WuBi, Hanzi, Unihan, study, Chinese
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• The Place of Scientific Objectivity in Historical Linguistics
  • From: allingus
• Re: Compound Christian names in US and elsewhere
  • From: Charles Riggs
• Re: accoustic evidence for uninterruption of speech
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: [Hebrew] dagesh qal - special case question
  • From: Helmut Richter
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Pinyin question - mary, merry, marry
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: accoustic evidence for uninterruption of speech
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: accoustic evidence for uninterruption of speech
  • From: dungping5
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Pinyin question - mary, merry, marry
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: e-mails needed...
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: [Hebrew] dagesh qal - special case question
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: "Low and Behold"
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: "Low and Behold"
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: "Low and Behold"
  • From: Prai Jei
• e-mails needed...
  • From: paulina
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: "Low and Behold"
  • From: Tommi Nieminen
• Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
  • From: António Marques
• "Low and Behold"
  • From: Neil Greenough
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: oldest writing we know and another question
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Geoff
• Re: ``best ... ever''
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Des Small
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: kleinecke
• Cantonese transliteration of CEDICT
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Pinyin question - mary, merry, marry
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Pinyin question - mary, merry, marry
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Pinyin question - mary, merry, marry
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Pinyin question - mary, merry, marry
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: What's a good book for linguistics in general?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: oldest writing we know and another question
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• Re: Croatian dialect 'brek'
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Ural-Altaic
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Invention of the Alphabet
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: Lee Sau Dan
• ISO age-graded vocabulary lists
  • From: kj
• Re: What's a good book for linguistics in general?
  • From: Matt Beckwith
• Re: Saharan language a.k.a. Basque/Ainu/Dravidian (Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...))
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Russian vowel ы
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ural-Altaic
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Pinyin question - mary, merry, marry
  • From: Dylan Sung
• Re: Ural-Altaic
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Ural-Altaic
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGLISH SPELLING
  • From: baal
• Re: Russian vowel ы
  • From: Wiktor S.
• Re: ``best ... ever''
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Pinyin question
  • From: kleinecke
• Saharan language a.k.a. Basque/Ainu/Dravidian (Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...))
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Croatian dialect 'brek'
  • From: andrew_woode
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Croatian dialect 'brek'
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Croatian dialect 'brek'
  • From: Skraedder
• Re: Croatian dialect 'brek'
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Scientific level
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Scientific level
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Dennis
• Re: der Indoeuropäische Urheimat
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Scientific level
  • From: gilgames
• Re: Scientific level
  • From: gilgames
• Re: Pinyin question - mary, merry, marry
  • From: Geoff Waters
• Re: WuBi, Hanzi, Unihan, study, Chinese
  • From: Jer
• Re: WuBi, Hanzi, Unihan, study, Chinese
  • From: Jer
• Re: WuBi, Hanzi, Unihan, study, Chinese
  • From: Jer
• Re: WuBi, Hanzi, Unihan, study, Chinese
  • From: Jer
• Re: ``best ... ever''
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Artem Baguinski
• Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Russian vowel ы
  • From: Marc Adler
• Re: Russian vowel <bI>
  • From: Keith Goeringer

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(13)