Re: What's a good book for linguistics in general?
"Joe Fineman" <joe_f@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> You were perhaps rash to mention it on this newsgroup,
> because it is highly opinionated & prescriptivist.
What, this newsgroup is too good for certain books? Give me a break.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Page numbering - URGENT
... >SOMEONE PLEASE HELP - CAN'T FIND ANSWERS IN MY BOOKS. ... please post all follow-ups to the ... newsgroup so all may benefit. ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.word.docmanagement) - Re: Hogan - shell world of golf
... I have his two books ... ... any additional resources please let me know at ... tomkelly@xxxxxxx in case I am taking up space on the newsgroup ... ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.sport.golf) - Re: Whats a good book for linguistics in general?
... Matt Beckwith wrote: ... >> You were perhaps rash to mention it on this newsgroup, ... Or certain books are too bad to be considered. ...
(sci.lang) - (and also Lazy Buttheads)...was: Re: Simple Questions and Assholes
... I read several of these posts, and the responses. ... Its not just this newsgroup, but also on lots of technical newsgroups. ... There are a lot of people that think: i) NGs are a source of _free_ advice, and ii) you not only can come up with any question, but the _lazy-easy_ way to do anything is preferred over doing any research via, say, google and heaven forbid that anyone should read books any more. ... What is wrong with doing some broad reading and thinking, ...
(rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors) - Re: Grateful acknowledgements
... Apologies for the repetition, the last message sliped away before I had ... consulted in the preparation of my books is fully cited and GRATEFULLY ... (_Plantagenet Ancestry_, pages 460-461), yet NOWHERE is her name to be ... had generously shared with the newsgroup. ...
(soc.genealogy.medieval) |
|
