Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:01:52 GMT
Joachim Pense wrote:
>
> Peter T. Daniels:
>
> > Joachim Pense wrote:
> >>
> >> Peter T. Daniels:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > A grammatical morpheme is a morpheme that has no semantic content of
> >> > its own -- in English the complete list of bound grammatical morphemes
> >> > is:
> >> > {s} plural, {s} possessive, {s} 3sg., {ing} pres.part., {ed} past, {en}
> >> > past part., {er} comparative, {est} superlative. The free grammatical
> >> > morphemes include conjunctions and prepositions (though some of them
> >> > have specific semantics as well).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Please kindly confirm to me, in order to clarify my understanding:
> >>
> >> You state that e.g., plural, past, comparative, and superlative are
> >> semantical contents, but they are not properties of the morphemes
> >> themselves - the morpheme "s" itself has no meaning unless it occurs in
> >> the context of a preceding noun or verb.
> >
> > The morphemes {s} are _bound morphemes_ -- they _cannot occur_ without
> > the context of a preceding noun or verb, so the question is meaningless.
>
> Then you should explain what your "a morpheme that has no semantic content
> of its own" should mean for bound grammatical morphemes.
You've never encountered the concepts "content word" and "function word"
before??
What is the meaning of "the"?
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
- From: António Marques
- Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
- References:
- Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
- Prev by Date: Re: oldest writing we know and another question
- Next by Date: Re: What's a good book for linguistics in general?
- Previous by thread: Re: Ural-Altaic. A fly
- Next by thread: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|