Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Dennis <tsalagiNOJUNK@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:53:31 -0500
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
I just updated my website on the Invention of the Alphabet:
http://www.geocities.com/ctesibos/alphabet/index.html
although it's still a bit ragged. I made use of recent remarks made here. I would appreciate any comments!
You seem not to have ever read anything I've written, or you couldn't include the spurious commonplace "The Greek language cannot be represented nearly as well without vowels as the Semitic languages can, so it may have been done out of necessity." If that were true, how would it be possible for Persian (and many other Iranian languages) to be written with varieties of Aramaic scripts?
True. It's also true that many shorthand systems leave out vowels.
However, I question how well, and whether, one could write Greek, or English, without vowels if also one did not write word divisions, as was the custom at first.
I'm sure you can understand this.
M sr y cn ndrstnd ths
Msrycnndrstndths
I think Greek would be rather like English in that regard, with about the same sort of consonant cluster sizes. How about Ukrainian? This site is an example of what can go wrong if one leaves out both vowels and word divisions there.
http://home.att.net/~oko/home.htm
Is Persian written without word divisions? How about Urdu? I doubt it, though I don't know.
Dennis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Prai Jei
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- References:
- Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Dennis
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Invention of the Alphabet
- Prev by Date: Re: Lithuanian similarities to IE (was Re: US House of Reps...)
- Next by Date: Re: [Hebrew] dagesh qal - special case question
- Previous by thread: Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- Next by thread: Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|