Re: Pinyin question
- From: Lee Sau Dan <danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 02 Aug 2005 22:30:17 +0800
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter T Daniels <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Wiktor> Something that's irritiating me, because I can never
Wiktor> remember which is which. Same for kami/kami, ame/ame,
Wiktor> hashi/hashi/hashi...
>> And how come I can remember which is which: "object"/"object",
>> "suspect"/"suspect", "permit"/"permit"???
Peter> Because the rule is rather simple: in such pairs, nouns are
Peter> stressed on the first syllable, verbs on the second.
But "effect"/"effect", "result"/"result" and "return"/"return" do not
follow this simple rule. There is no simple rule.
--
Lee Sau Dan 李守敦 ~{@nJX6X~}
E-mail: danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home page: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~danlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Pinyin question
- References:
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Bart Mathias
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Dylan Sung
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Wiktor S.
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Pinyin question
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Pinyin question
- Prev by Date: Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- Next by Date: Re: Semantic content (was: Ural-Altaic. A fly)
- Previous by thread: Re: Pinyin question
- Next by thread: Re: Pinyin question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|