Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Greg Lee <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Aug 2005 16:08:19 GMT
Des Small <des.small@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
....
> I've persisted in defending Peter's very concrete and explicit test
> for opacity.
....
But LSD makes the points that opaque expressions are not necessarily
words and that compound words are not necessarily opaque. Therefore,
a test for opacity is not a good test for words. These are good
points.
--
Greg Lee <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Des Small
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- References:
- Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Dennis
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Des Small
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Greg Lee
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Des Small
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Des Small
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Des Small
- Invention of the Alphabet
- Prev by Date: Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- Next by Date: Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- Previous by thread: Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- Next by thread: Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|