Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Dennis <tsalagiNOJUNK@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:34:03 -0500
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
Perhaps we use stress in English to clear up syntactic ambiguity. How about German Bundesnachrichtdienst, Federal Intelligence Agency (their version of the US CIA). In English you could say *Federal* Intelligence Agency to emphasize that it's a federal agency and not a regional one, Federal *Intelligence* Agency to emphasize that it's an intelligence agency and not a social services agency, or put about equal stress on all words and say them quickly (I think) to refer to that specific organization. So, does that mean that English "Federal Intelligence Agency" is one word? I've no idea how that would all come out in German, though obviously the name of the organization itself is a single word.
I read about this in an old book that I know is outdated, and I wondered what the current thinking is. Can't think of any examples from that book.
As Greg and I mentioned yesterday, there's no universal definition of "word."
I guess that's my answer, that it would depend how you define "word". So, the Germans think of the name BND as one word, but the Federal Intelligence Agency, in English, isn't one word, even though stress patterns give further information.
Can you think of the name of the book?
I think it was Hall, Robert A., Jr. "There's Nothing Wrong with Your Language." Linguistics and Your Language. 1960. Bloomfield was the state of the art in this book. I had just started reading about linguistics.
Dennis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- References:
- Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Dennis
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Dennis
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Alan
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Lee Sau Dan
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Dennis
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Dennis
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Dennis
- Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Invention of the Alphabet
- Prev by Date: Re: Derivation of Term Abugida
- Next by Date: Re: ******** Flame alert ******** [was: Re: "have got" [was: Re: 'ing' form of 'to stymie' (& do any other vbs end in 'ie' pronounced [i]?)]]
- Previous by thread: Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- Next by thread: Re: Invention of the Alphabet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|