Re: How many people can read Sumerian Cuneiform

nygdan_morteauxspam@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> There's a lot of people that can accurately read italian, chinese, and
> all sorts of other languages, but how many people can actually pick up
> a sumerian tablet and read the cuneiform? Once the cuneiform is
> transliterated, is it basically the same amount of people that can now
> read that text?
>
> I ask perhaps for a silly reason, because I am wondering if Sitchin
> actually reads the stuff, the transliterations, or if he can't read it
> and instead just bases his interpretations upon what other people have
> already translated into english or some other modern language.
>
> I'd think that there are only a very few people out there who have the
> acdademic training and motivation to read the stuff. Is that wrong?

One of the first people to pick up and learn cuneiform had no academic
training. I forget his name, but he found a version of the flood tale.
Unfortunately he dies very young.

Axel
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How many people can read Sumerian Cuneiform
    ... >> all sorts of other languages, but how many people can actually pick up ... >> a sumerian tablet and read the cuneiform? ... >> actually reads the stuff, the transliterations, or if he can't read it ... but he found a version of the flood tale. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • How many people can read Sumerian Cuneiform
    ... all sorts of other languages, but how many people can actually pick up ... a sumerian tablet and read the cuneiform? ... actually reads the stuff, the transliterations, or if he can't read it ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: I wish I were JTEM
    ... Egyptian is known. ... We know how to pronounce the transliterations. ... Except the transliterations are based on our understanding of the phonology of the languages they represent...apparently that didn't occur to you, or that if we don't know how to pronounce the original languages, then any transliteration is false, and one can't then claim that two transliterations from two different languages would sound alike much less that they'd sound alike in their original languages and have anything to do with one another....another fact that didn't occur to JStupid Bates and his fecal mind. ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
  • Re: Greek, glagolitic, cyrillic
    ... Now try that with an Indic script. ... It's not only Indian languages that use Indic scripts. ... Tell that to the millions of Japanese. ... No "configuring", no "manipulating software", no transliterations. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • JStupid gets beaten up by his own strawman again
    ... We know how to pronounce the transliterations. ... and while there is only voicing to generally differentiate them, both languages do so differentiate. ... If we're wrong about the way the ancient language sounded, ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
Quantcast