Re: Hebrew and tradition
- From: joel@xxxxxxx (Dr. Joel M. Hoffman)
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:10:48 GMT
>> if they could be described together. (And your book seems to treat
>> Masoretic Hebrew as if it were an accurate portrayal of the language as
>> it was when it was last spoken natively many centuries earlier.)
>
>My reading of Hoffman is just the opposite. he clearly claims that
>Masoretic Hebrew is not Biblical Hebrew or Late Biblical Hebrew. You just
>asked why his book is better than Saenz-Badillos. Here's another way.
>Saenz-Badillos puts Masoretic Hebrew in his chapter on Biblical Hebrew.
>Hoffman avoids the mistake you just accused him of.
Yes. I devote significant attention to the question of how well the
various Masoretes captured Biblical Hebrew, noting along the way that
we must not assume that they are the same. One of my complaints about
Saenz-Badillos is that he puts his discussion of Masoretic Hebrew in
his chapter on "Biblical Hebrew in Its Various Traditions." But let
me be clear. As I say in my own book, I think _A History of the
Hebrew Language_ is a wonderful book.
-Joel Hoffman
http://www.exc.com/JoelHoffman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hebrew and tradition
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Hebrew and tradition
- References:
- Hebrew and tradition
- From: Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
- Re: Hebrew and tradition
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Hebrew and tradition
- From: Rachel Jones
- Hebrew and tradition
- Prev by Date: Re: Hebrew and tradition
- Next by Date: Re: Schroeder vs Merkel: A tale of two Germanys
- Previous by thread: Re: Hebrew and tradition
- Next by thread: Re: Hebrew and tradition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|