Re: ASCII convention


Joachim Pense wrote:
> Peter T. Daniels:
>
> > Joachim Pense wrote:
> >>
> >> Jukka K. Korpela:
> >>
> >> > Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Those three paragraphs are irrelevant to the question of what to use
> >> >> in ASCII.
> >> >
> >> > (So why did you quote them?)
> >> >
> >> > I didn't notice any restriction to ASCII in the question, though the
> >>
> >> You should have looked at the subject.
> >
> > Hmm, that's the second time he's gotten himself in trouble for not
> > looking at the header!
>
> He is of course right in pointing that it is good style to put all relevant
> parts of the posting into the body. But still, a look at the subject could
> have saved him some typing.

I did indicate the *reason* I asked for ASCII. I thought that graphemes
were represented in italics *always*. it turns out only to be the
convention of the particular article I was reading.

>
> Joachim

.

Relevant Pages
Loading