Re: The Tally-Ho! Theory of Language Origins
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:50:15 GMT
rogerprince@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Douglas G. Kilday wrote:
>
> > > > What about the ichneumon?
> > >
> > > It tracks by scent or direct sight, like other mustelids (if it is a
> > > mustelid).
> >
> > If it doesn't follow visible tracks, how did it get its name?
>
> If the hippopotamus isn't a horse, how did it get its name? A tracker
> dog doesn't follow visible tracks either, even if they're there for a
> human to follow, and etymology is not a reliable guide to how animals
> actually behave anyway.
Nor to much of anything at all in a language-in-use.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Re: The Tally-Ho! Theory of Language Origins
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: The Tally-Ho! Theory of Language Origins
- From: rogerprince
- Re: The Tally-Ho! Theory of Language Origins
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: The Tally-Ho! Theory of Language Origins
- From: rogerprince
- Re: The Tally-Ho! Theory of Language Origins
- Prev by Date: Re: ASCII convention
- Next by Date: Re: ASCII convention
- Previous by thread: Re: The Tally-Ho! Theory of Language Origins
- Next by thread: Re: The Tally-Ho! Theory of Language Origins
- Index(es):