Re: ASCII convention

From: Andreas Prilop <nhtcapri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:38:28 +0200

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

> Mac Roman is now utterly obsolete, as is Monsieur Pirard's
> MacRoman to ISO-8859-1 abomination. OS X (2001) is based on
> Unicode, as Windows has been since Windows NT (1993).

It is hopeless to try to explain this to Peter Daniels.
We had this before and he just refuses to learn anything.

--
Top-posting.
What's the most irritating thing on Usenet?

.

References:
- ASCII convention
  - From: Yusuf B Gursey
- Re: ASCII convention
  - From: Christopher Culver
- Re: ASCII convention
  - From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: ASCII convention
  - From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ASCII convention
  - From: Miguel Carrasquer
- Re: ASCII convention
  - From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ASCII convention
  - From: Miguel Carrasquer
- Re: ASCII convention
  - From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ASCII convention
  - From: Miguel Carrasquer

Prev by Date: Re: ASCII convention
Next by Date: Audio samples of Flemish dialects
Previous by thread: Re: ASCII convention
Next by thread: Re: ASCII convention
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: How does compare gcc to VS C++ ?
... mjt wrote: ... >>Windows isn't the abomination that everybody always wants to make it out ... a high performance workstation/server;-). ...
(comp.os.linux.misc)
Re: How does compare gcc to VS C++ ?
... > Windows isn't the abomination that everybody always wants to make it out ... yea, all the top 50 supercomputers are running ...
(comp.os.linux.misc)