Re: ASCII convention
- From: António Marques <m.ap@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:55:58 +0100
Lee Sau Dan wrote:
Ruud> I fully agree with you on this. I still use Eudora 2.2 for Ruud> e-mail, dating from 1995, perhaps even older than Netscape Ruud> 3.
Yeah! Less is more! And you don't have to worry about getting
infection from viruses that exploit the insecure scripting capability of some lousy and buggy mail agents! :)
I don't know what places you're used to, but less than half of the inhabitants of sci.lang use Outlook. To keep making fun of it is tantamount to admitting to assume most of the people here don't know alternatives, which makes you look dumb.
--
am
laurus : rhodophyta : brezoneg : smalltalk : stargate .
- References:
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Yusuf B Gursey
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: ASCII convention
- Prev by Date: Re: ASCII convention
- Next by Date: Re: ASCII convention
- Previous by thread: Re: ASCII convention
- Next by thread: Re: ASCII convention
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|