Re: Barbara Bush Re: ASCII convention
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:46:50 GMT
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> Peter T. Daniels <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Last month she notoriously commented that the hurricane refugees in the
> > Houston Astrodome were "probably better off" than they had been in their
> > homes, because they were "underprivileged."
>
> Well, better than calling them "poor", which would be very much
> politically incorrect, I guess.
>
> Which brings me to the American English pronunciation of "poor".
> The last few times I heard that word mentioned on US TV shows it
> sounded an awful lot like "pour". Is there a poor/pour merger going
> on in General American or regionally?
No; /uw/ is [uw] mostly, but [O] widely (mostly "Southern") as well.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Barbara Bush Re: ASCII convention
- From: andrew_woode
- Re: Barbara Bush Re: ASCII convention
- References:
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ASCII convention
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Barbara Bush Re: ASCII convention
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Barbara Bush Re: ASCII convention
- From: Christian Weisgerber
- Re: ASCII convention
- Prev by Date: Re: How many syllables in "shiitake"?
- Next by Date: Re: /x/ Re: ASCII convention
- Previous by thread: Re: Barbara Bush Re: ASCII convention
- Next by thread: Re: Barbara Bush Re: ASCII convention
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|