Re: "standard" Arabic translation of Don Quixote


Marc Adler wrote:
> Is there a translation of Don Quixote which is considered "standard" in
> Arabic?

Doesn't Cervantes make it quite clear that his book is in fact a
translation from an Arabic original by Cide Hamete Benengeli? I think
Sancho gets the name wrong & calls him "Berenjena".

Nigel

--
ScriptMaster language resources (Chinese/Modern & Classical
Greek/IPA/Persian/Russian/Turkish):
http://www.elgin.free-online.co.uk

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "standard" Arabic translation of Don Quixote
    ... > Is there a translation of Don Quixote which is considered "standard" in ... (There isn't in English.) ... > recommend a good translation, and point me to an online bookseller ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: What a translation unit is.
    ... >> vendor is going to try to follow the standard. ... That is an internal compiler TU. ... >There are also other types of translation units but they are not really ... things source code, internal form, and object code, since they are ...
    (alt.comp.lang.learn.c-cpp)
  • Re: What a translation unit is.
    ... Quite apart from the standard definitions given in ... Will you next claim that Borland and Comeau don't write ... > vendor is going to try to follow the standard. ... There are also other types of translation units but they are not really ...
    (alt.comp.lang.learn.c-cpp)
  • Re: linking c++ code with c library
    ... All external object and function references are resolved. ... objects not defined in the current translation. ... I think he means that the C standard does not mention dynamic linking ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re:
    ... both in the C standard as well as gcc docs. ... is indeed meant to be same as "translation unit", ... reasonably want to call a "compilation unit" as all that the compiler sees ...
    (Linux-Kernel)